This is my original array: a = [0, 4, 7, 8, 1, 3, 5, 2, 6] and this is what it prints: [0, 4, 7, 0, 0, 0, 5, 0, 0] Answer As @’Lee Jun Wei’ it doesn’t look like your algo is right. But there may be a few other things to point out. These two lines look off.
Tag: sorting
Sort a list according to the ascending sort of the second list in python
I have two unsorted lists, x and y, as follows: I would like to sort list y two times, one in ascending order and then in descending order. But, in each sorting of y, I need to sort also the corresponding elements of the list x accordingly. Both lists have the same length of items. I tried with the following
Order CSV with two digit numbers
I’m trying to create a leaderboard for a game, where after the game has been played, the python script accesses a CSV file (not ordered) and prints out the top 5 people with the highest score. Python seems to do this fine with single-digit numbers, but I can’t get it to work with 2 digit numbers. Here is the code:
Python sorted not sorting Counter output properly
I am trying to sort out min page load time and max page load time from Apache access log file. After parsing the log file and sorting using sorted I am seeing weird sorting. The above code sorting thousandths and only then sorting hundreds: As you see 455 and 677 are at the end, but if you look separately at
Sort lists of dictionaries within dictionary
EDIT: I’m editing the whole post as it wasn’t as clear as I thougt. I have this dictionary (list of dictionaries within a dictionary) and I need to sort it by the values of “Position” and “Team”, meaning that I need to get all the values from those two keys and print them as I show below. I know how
why sorted() in python didn’t accept positional arguments?
this line always gives a error-> TypeError: sorted expected 1 argument, got 2 in fact the syntax of sorted is sorted(iterable,key,reverse), in which key and reverse are optional, so according to this, second parameter i pass must go with key. and when i def my own func here 200 automatically passed as y argument for func2. How does this work?
Pickle all variables
I”m looking for a way to pickle all the variables with their values in a sorted order. I’m trying the method below: Expected result: Append value of va to totalList , then vb’s value..and so on. And then dump the totalList to a pickle file. I’m getting result like this: I want to get rid of the results (‘pickle’, ‘time’,
Python regex function to arrange key:value in descending order. Wherein the key is alphanumeric and the value is digits
Say I have a column which has values like: I would like the piece of code that I am working on to return: I’m trying to get the code to sort this key-value pair based on the value of the item in descending order This is the code I have written as of now, but it’s sorting based on the
Binary Insertion Sort vs. Quicksort
I was looking at different sorting algorithms and their performance (link) and then I tried to implement some sorting algorithms myself. I wanted to improve them as well and so, as I was coding the insertion sort, I thought why not to use binary search, as the first part of array is already sorted, and in order to get rid
Sort pandas DataFrame rows by a list of (index) numbers
I have a pandas DataFrame with 229 rows. I have a list of index numbers ([47, 16, 59, …]) and I want to re-sort the rows of my DataFrame into this order. Details: I ran the DF through a filter (specifically, scipy.cluster.hierarchy.dendrogram, setting get_leaves=True). The return value includes a list of index numbers (leaves) in order of the dendrogram leaf