The title explains itself, how to get 2 out of the object
slice(0,2)
The documentation is somewhat confusing, or it is the wrong one
https://docs.python.org/2/c-api/slice.html
In particular I don’t understand what is the meaning of the output of
slice(0,2).indices(0) # (0, 0, 1) slice(0,2).indices(10 ** 10) # (0, 2, 1)
One possible workaround is to slice a list with the slice object
a = [1,2,3,4,5] len(a[slice(0,2)]) # 2
But this will fail for an arbitrary large slice.
Thanks, I couldn’t find an answer In other posts.
Advertisement
Answer
There is no complete answer for this. slice
doesn’t give you a length because the length of the result is always dependent on the size of the sequence being sliced, a short sequence (including an empty sequence) will produce fewer items, and if the slice
is unbounded, then the length will grow in tandem with the length of the sequence; a slice
might just go “to end of sequence” by having a start
or stop
of None
.
For a quick and easy way to compute the length for a sequence of a known length, you just combine .indices
with Py3’s range
(or xrange
in Py2, though xrange
has limitations on values that Py3 range
does not). slice.indices
gives you the concrete start
, stop
and stride
values derived when a slice
applies to a sequence of a given length, it’s basically the values you’d fill in in a C-style for
loop that traverses the same indices as the slice
:
for (ssize_t i = start; i < stop; i += stride)
So to calculate the length of a slice
when applied to a sequence with 1000 elements, you’d do:
>>> len(range(*slice(0, 2).indices(1000))) 2 >>> len(range(*slice(10, None, 3).indices(1000))) 330
If you’re on Python 2, and your values might exceed what xrange
can handle (it’s limited to bounds and total length equal to what a ssize_t
can hold), you can just do the calculation by hand:
def slice_len_for(slc, seqlen): start, stop, step = slc.indices(seqlen) return max(0, (stop - start + (step - (1 if step > 0 else -1))) // step) >>> slice_len_for(slice(10, None, 3), 1000) 330
Update: Unfortunately, slice.indices
itself won’t accept a len
for the sequence beyond what a long
can hold, so this doesn’t gain you anything over using xrange
in Py2. Left in place for those interested, but the workaround doesn’t workaround anything unless you also perform the work slice
does to convert negative values and None
to concrete values based on the sequence length. Sigh.