From the logging
howto for Python 2.7 (my emphasis):
A good convention to use when naming loggers is to use a module-level logger, in each module which uses logging, named as follows:
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
This means that logger names track the package/module hierarchy, and it’s intuitively obvious where events are logged just from the logger name.
Sounds like good advice.
Now, the logging
cookbook provides an example for multiple modules, which uses hard-coded logger names instead of the __name__
constant. In the “main module” from the example we find
logger = logging.getLogger('spam_application')
and in the “auxiliary module” we find
module_logger = logging.getLogger('spam_application.auxiliary')
I copied this example verbatim into a package folder with the following structure:
cookbook-example |- __init__.py |- main_module.py |- auxiliary_module.py
This runs without issue, producing the expected logging output from both the main module and the auxiliary module, but here’s the thing:
If I now replace the hard-coded logger names by the __name__
constant, as recommended by the logging
howto, the cookbook example breaks down: I only get logging messages from the main module, but nothing from the auxiliary module.
I must be missing something obvious. Any ideas what I am doing wrong?
Note:
There are a lot of very similar questions and related answers, e.g.: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and many more. However, none of those appear to address this specific question.
–Edit–
Here’s a minimal example based on the cookbook example, with the explicit name strings replaced by __name__
.
main_module.py
import logging import auxiliary_module # create and configure main logger logger = logging.getLogger(__name__) logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG) # create console handler with a higher log level handler = logging.StreamHandler() handler.setLevel(logging.DEBUG) # create formatter and add it to the handler formatter = logging.Formatter('%(asctime)s - %(name)s - %(levelname)s - %(message)s') handler.setFormatter(formatter) # add the handler to the logger logger.addHandler(handler) logger.info('message from main module') auxiliary_module.some_function()
auxiliary_module.py
import logging # create logger module_logger = logging.getLogger(__name__) def some_function(): module_logger.info('message from auxiliary module')
Advertisement
Answer
As pointed out by @shmee in this answer, the logger hierarchy must be defined explicitly in the logger name, using dot-notation. That is, if the logger name in main_module.py
is e.g. 'a'
, then the logger name in auxiliary_module.py
must be 'a.b'
(not just 'b'
), in order for it to inherit the configuration of logger 'a'
. This is also mentioned in the getLogger()
documentation.
However, this should be taken care of automatically when using __name__
, as noted in the logging
how-to:
This means that logger names track the package/module hierarchy, and it’s intuitively obvious where events are logged just from the logger name.
The thing is, for this to work, you need to use __name__
in the correct way, and I did not do that.
The problem in my example is in the organization of the files in the cookbook-example
package folder:
Both the main module and the auxiliary module are at the same level (i.e. in the same folder). So, as explained here, the __name__
for the main module will then be '__main__'
(as it is the top-level script), and the __name__
for the auxiliary module will be 'auxiliary_module'
(i.e. the filename), NOT '__main__.auxiliary_module'
.
As a result, the logger in the auxiliary module will be a child of the root logger, not a child of the '__main__'
logger, and it will thus inherit the root logger configuration (which still has the default logging level WARNING
) instead of the configuration specified in the main module.
So, to make the example work, we have several options:
Replace
getLogger(__name__)
in the main module bygetLogger()
. This will apply the config to the root logger and therefore also to the auxiliary module logger, as suggested by @shmee.Replace
getLogger(__name__)
in the auxiliary module bygetLogger('__main__.' + __name__)
. The result will be equivalent to the original cookbook-example (except that the main logger is now called'__main__'
instead of'spam_application'
).